Main menu

Search
Login
Signup
Links
<< Previous thread | Next thread >>   
New version of PhotoFilmStrip

Author Post
dropper
Sat 03 Oct 2015 - 22:57

online
Registered Member #39636
Joined: Tue 15 Feb 2011 - 23:47
Posts: 165

Meanwhile was offered a new version of PhotoFilmStrip (2.0.0-RC1). Would be nice, if the winpenpack website can integrate this new version.


[ Edited Sat 03 Oct 2015 - 22:58 ]
Back to top
Taf
Tue 06 Oct 2015 - 09:07

online

Registered Member #251
Joined: Mon 22 Jan 2007 - 10:12
Location: Buttrio (UD)
Posts: 3266
Hi dropper,
official "X" version will be released as soon as we can. Actually we are a bit busy.

anyway, you have 2 possibilities:

-First-
use the natively portable edition of 2.0 RC1, present on official site
here is the link for direct DL:
-Link-

-second-
use the RC1 version inside old X-photofilmstrip package
you need only to put the folders present in new 2.0 RC1 version already downloaded into the BIN/photofilmstrip/ foder present in our previous package.

anyway, first option is easier and works fine....

[ Edited Tue 06 Oct 2015 - 09:08 ]
Back to top
Danix
Tue 06 Oct 2015 - 11:36

online

Registered Member #1
Joined: Fri 29 Dec 2006 - 05:38
Location: Sassari
Posts: 12873
Updated! -Link-

P.S. now we update X-Software only on request..

[ Edited Tue 06 Oct 2015 - 11:39 ]
Back to top
Website
Taf
Tue 06 Oct 2015 - 14:43

online

Registered Member #251
Joined: Mon 22 Jan 2007 - 10:12
Location: Buttrio (UD)
Posts: 3266
Danix wrote ...

Updated! -Link-

P.S. now we update X-Software only on request..


Perfect Danix, good to know!
Back to top
dropper
Wed 07 Oct 2015 - 00:00

online
Registered Member #39636
Joined: Tue 15 Feb 2011 - 23:47
Posts: 165
Hi Taf,

in your answer you recommend me to use 2 possibilities in the meantime, as long as the new official "X" version will be released (which was now done by Danix).

But I think, that your 2. recommendation is a little bit insufficient. Because the portability ought to be re-examined. Because some changes made by the programmer can lead to the result, that the originally given portability is no longer valid. Therefore your recommendation is only true in the case, that the natively portable edition of 2.0.0 RC1, which will provided on official site, indeed is completely portable.
Back to top
Taf
Wed 07 Oct 2015 - 08:37

online

Registered Member #251
Joined: Mon 22 Jan 2007 - 10:12
Location: Buttrio (UD)
Posts: 3266
dropper wrote ...

Hi Taf,
SNIPPED
But I think, that your 2. recommendation is a little bit insufficient. Because the portability ought to be re-examined. Because some changes made by the programmer can lead to the result, that the originally given portability is no longer valid. Therefore your recommendation is only true in the case, that the natively portable edition of 2.0.0 RC1, which will provided on official site, indeed is completely portable.


You are 100% right, dropper!
My second suggestion was only a temporary "workaround" to have new release inside OLD launcher, waiting for our official release (now already made!). In fact I also suggest to use FIRST temporary solution...

[ Edited Wed 07 Oct 2015 - 08:39 ]
Back to top

Moderators: Danix, Taf, Rcs, Energy, zandet2, ZioZione, Admin, LordJim60

Jump:     Back to top

Syndicate this thread: rss 0.92 Syndicate this thread: rss 2.0 Syndicate this thread: RDF
Powered by e107 Forum System